1966 Abarth 595 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 595. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 595.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth 595. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth 595. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth 595.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 595 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | 595 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |