1966 Abarth 595 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 595. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 595 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 251 more horse power than 1966 Abarth 595. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth 595.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth 595. (45 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth 595. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1966 Abarth 595 has manual transmission. 1966 Abarth 595 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth 595 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 595 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
