1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 671 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Abarth | Riley |
| Model | Mono 1000 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2870 mm |
