1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1965 Alpine A 110
To start off, 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 982 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Alpine A 110 weights approximately 11 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1965 Alpine A 110 | |
| Make | Abarth | Alpine |
| Model | Mono 1000 | A 110 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |
