1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1981 Chrysler Avenger
To start off, 1981 Chrysler Avenger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Avenger weights approximately 316 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Chrysler Avenger (93 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1981 Chrysler Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1981 Chrysler Avenger | |
Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
Model | Mono 1000 | Avenger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2500 mm |