1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | Mono 1000 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |