1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1999 Daewoo Korando
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Korando is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Korando (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Korando weights approximately 524 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Korando (421 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1999 Daewoo Korando | |
Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
Model | Mono 1000 | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 421 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1088 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 48 L |