1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 806 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | Mono 1000 | Avenger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 49 L |