1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 391 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 574 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Viper |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 7999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 450 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 664 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 98.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |
