1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 1236 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | Mono 1000 | F-Type |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2390 mm |