1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 536 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | Mono 1000 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 3997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2890 mm |
