1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1826 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 4670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 2390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 99 L |
