1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 946 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Abarth | Chrysler |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 3195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
