1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | Mono 1000 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |