1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | Mono 1000 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |