1966 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 894 kg more than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Abarth | Mini |
Model | Mono 1000 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 564 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 47 L |