1966 Abarth OT vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1948 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | OT | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2040 mm |
