1966 Abarth OT vs. 1950 Austin A 40
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1950 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A 40 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1950 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | OT | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 34 L |
