1966 Abarth OT vs. 1950 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Abarth OT weights approximately 312 kg more than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1950 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | OT | 2CV |
Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 10 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 498 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 19 L |