1966 Abarth OT vs. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 weights approximately 333 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
| Model | OT | 3000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2911 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1143 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 54 L |
