1966 Abarth OT vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1408 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | 62 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |