1966 Abarth OT vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 3200 CS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 790 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Abarth | BMW |
Model | OT | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |