1966 Abarth OT vs. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 470 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | OT | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 83.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.9 mm |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 54 L |