1966 Abarth OT vs. 1965 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1966 Abarth OT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1965 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 95 L |
