1966 Abarth OT vs. 1970 Citroen Dyane
To start off, 1970 Citroen Dyane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Abarth OT weights approximately 220 kg more than 1970 Citroen Dyane.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Citroen Dyane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1970 Citroen Dyane | |
| Make | Abarth | Citroen |
| Model | OT | Dyane |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 423 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |
