1966 Abarth OT vs. 1980 Austin Mini Metro
To start off, 1980 Austin Mini Metro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 37 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1980 Austin Mini Metro | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | OT | Mini Metro |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 31 L |