1966 Abarth OT vs. 1982 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1982 Opel Kadett is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Abarth OT weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Opel Kadett.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1982 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | Abarth | Opel |
| Model | OT | Kadett |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2520 mm |
