1966 Abarth OT vs. 1983 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Seville is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 860 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1983 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | Seville |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4080 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2900 mm |