1966 Abarth OT vs. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 805 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5012 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |