1966 Abarth OT vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 340 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | Midge |
Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1400 mm |