1966 Abarth OT vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
| Model | OT | Musso |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |
