1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura EL weights approximately 269 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2000 Acura EL | |
| Make | Abarth | Acura |
| Model | OT | EL |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2619 mm |
