1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 788 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Triax |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2790 mm |
