1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Citroen C 15
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2000 Citroen C 15 | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | OT | C 15 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1761 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 23.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 66 L |