1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 2000 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotus GT 1 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2000 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | OT | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 573 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2690 mm |