1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Korando. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1156 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | OT | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1866 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |