1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Korando. (142 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | OT | Korando |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2490 mm |