1966 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 800 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | OT | Celica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 87 L |
