1966 Abarth OT vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Abarth | MG |
| Model | OT | X20 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
