1966 Abarth OT vs. 2002 AC Aceca
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 700 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2002 AC Aceca | |
| Make | Abarth | AC |
| Model | OT | Aceca |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
