1966 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 71 L |