1966 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Abarth OT. (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | OT | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 3270 mm |
