1966 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1966 Abarth OT. (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | OT | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 78 L |
