1966 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 952 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | Equinox |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |