1966 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |