1966 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 909 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2004 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Abarth | Pontiac |
| Model | OT | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1719 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
