1966 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2004 Smart ForFour is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForFour weights approximately 165 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2004 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | OT | ForFour |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 47 L |