1966 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth OT (185 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Citi weights approximately 147 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
| Make | Abarth | Volkswagen |
| Model | OT | Citi |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 245 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 49 L |
