1966 Abarth OT vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth OT | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |