1966 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1966 Abarth OT.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Abarth | Citroen |
| Model | OT | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |
